🔗 Share this article

One of the most famous photographs of the twentieth century portrays a nude girl, her hands outstretched, her face twisted in terror, her flesh scorched and raw. She is fleeing towards the lens after fleeing an airstrike in the Vietnam War. Nearby, youngsters also run from the devastated community of Trảng Bàng, with a backdrop of thick fumes and the presence of soldiers.

The Worldwide Effect of a Powerful Picture

Shortly after its release in June 1972, this photograph—formally called "The Terror of War"—evolved into a traditional sensation. Viewed and debated globally, it's broadly attributed with energizing worldwide views critical of the conflict during that era. An influential critic later commented how the profoundly indelible photograph of nine-year-old the girl in distress likely was more effective to heighten popular disgust regarding the hostilities compared to extensive footage of broadcast atrocities. A renowned British documentarian who documented the war called it the single best photo of the so-called “The Television War”. One more veteran war journalist remarked that the picture represents in short, one of the most important images ever taken, specifically of the Vietnam war.

The Decades-Long Claim and a Modern Assertion

For 53 years, the photo was assigned to Nick Út, a then-21-year-old local photojournalist employed by a major news agency at the time. But a controversial recent documentary on a popular platform argues which states the iconic photograph—long considered to be the peak of war journalism—might have been shot by someone else on the scene in Trảng Bàng.

According to the investigation, The Terror of War was in fact photographed by a stringer, who offered his photos to the AP. The allegation, and the film’s subsequent investigation, began with an individual called Carl Robinson, who alleges how a influential photo chief directed him to change the image’s credit from the original photographer to Nick Út, the sole AP staff photographer there during the incident.

The Quest for Answers

The former editor, advanced in years, emailed one of the journalists a few years ago, seeking assistance in finding the unknown stringer. He mentioned that, if he could be found, he wished to extend an acknowledgment. The journalist thought of the unsupported photojournalists he worked with—comparing them to current independents, similar to independent journalists at the time, are often marginalized. Their work is often challenged, and they operate under much more difficult circumstances. They are not insured, no retirement plans, they don’t have support, they often don’t have adequate tools, making them incredibly vulnerable as they capture images within their homeland.

The journalist asked: How would it feel to be the individual who took this iconic picture, should it be true that he was not the author?” As a photographer, he speculated, it could be extraordinarily painful. As a student of war photography, specifically the highly regarded war photography of Vietnam, it might be groundbreaking, maybe reputation-threatening. The respected history of the image among the community meant that the director whose parents fled at the time felt unsure to engage with the investigation. He stated, I hesitated to disrupt this long-held narrative that credited Nick the picture. Nor did I wish to disturb the status quo of a community that had long looked up to this achievement.”

This Search Unfolds

Yet the two the investigator and his collaborator concluded: it was necessary raising the issue. When reporters must hold everybody else responsible,” remarked the investigator, we must be able to ask difficult questions of ourselves.”

The investigation documents the journalists while conducting their inquiry, from discussions with witnesses, to requests in modern the city, to reviewing records from related materials recorded at the time. Their search lead to an identity: a driver, employed by NBC during the attack who also sold photographs to the press independently. In the film, a heartfelt the man, now also in his 80s based in the US, claims that he handed over the famous picture to the agency for a small fee with a physical photo, yet remained haunted by the lack of credit over many years.

The Response Followed by Additional Analysis

Nghệ appears in the film, thoughtful and calm, but his story became controversial within the field of photojournalism. {Days before|Shortly prior to